Do they have any proven track record of repairing guns purchased 2nd hand, that would not be eligible for warranty work? My guess is that you will never get a warranty repair approved by them since you are NOT the original purchaser of the firearm. I think you're SOL Josh, but I could be wrong. Don't pour good money after bad money is my advice.
I may have missed this fact, or forgotten... Josh, if you are not the original owner, I do think you could have a serious problem. While Rohrbaugh wasn't very strict about policing this issue before the sale, I don't know the same will be true of Remington.
Warranty repair (and, perhaps replacments) is going to be expensive for them. I can see them honoring the claims they have to honor, but I would suspect they may not honor claims for which they have an "out."
As an example, Smith & Wesson is very good about repairing their guns no matter who owns it. However, if you try to make a warranty claim on an old gun for which they don't have parts and you are clearly not the original owner--chances are your claim will be denied. S&W and many companies are generous with their warranty repairs, but only until the point it starts to hurt... Remington may well decide there is going to be no latittude on guns that pre-date their acquisition, and no one could really blame them for it.
I guess we will see. I hope I am wrong.