Reminds me of someone's quote to the extent of
"I've never interviewed anyone who had been in a handgun battle that didn't want more ammunition or a larger caliber"
Seems like a lot of officers around these parts carry .45 off duty.
My US Marshal buddy says they can now carry ANY caliber of Glock they want to. Just has to be Glock. No G42 obviously. Not sure about subcompacts.
Anyway I'm sure 9 is plenty good with the new potent expanding rounds offered.
Interesting that they threw in with one manufacturer like that.
-I understand why one would. I
am a Glock guy, but I'd carry any other major manufacturer without much thought about it. Who could legitimately complain about Sig, Smith, HK, etc.?
The Glock subcompacts are, to me and many others, just as good as their bigger brothers.
I agree with you on 9mm.
At the same time I get it for those who do it.
If you offered me one duty handgun round, and one round only, to shoot an adversary, I
would choose .45.
Why not? It's a bigger hole.
But capacity does matter, and
none of the .45s get down to the size of the 9s.