I have a P7M8, I just took it through a course earlier this month - it's a GREAT pistol.
I guess they were just too expensive and didn't have high enough mag capacity.
Expensive yes. Maybe you were not aware of the double stack mag version, the P7M13, Now THAT one is EXPensive!
Yes, I'm very aware of the double stack P7M13 and P7M10, but in comparison to the 15+ round capacities available today from Glock, H&K, Sig, S.A., etc. those are still "low capacity" by today's standards.
Gee I just learned someting! I didin't know that a P7M13 and a Browning HI Power were considered "low capacity" like 7-8 rd 1911s .
Compared to the current gen
9mm full-size pistols, i.e., a 17-rd Glock 17, 16 rd XD, they are! "Low" capacity is a relative term based on what else is available. Despite the P7's rather compact size, it's weight is in the full size class due to the all-steel construction. Most pistols of similar weight have at least 2 additional round capacity. Even their M10 .40 is 2 rds shy of a Sig P229, for example. The typical 7-8 rd 1911 is chambered for .45, so it's not an A - A comparison. 1911's have their own appeal due to the wide variety of aftermarket parts and customization options. Plus, it just has that historical 1911 mystique. It's the eternal bore dia vs. capacity debate, and both sides have merits. A sizable % of people who choose 9mm for a carry piece do so because they favor capacity over bore diameter. As fine a pistol as the P7 is, even the M13 has at least 2 fewer rounds on tap than the current crop of self-defense pistols. It's price tag compared to most competing pistols didn't help its future either. Despite all this, I love its ergos, its unique design, low slide mass b/c of the gas piston delay system, low bore axis, narrow, snag-free width, polygonal rifling, accuracy, and proven reliability.