Author Topic: Anyone try Nitesiters  (Read 8609 times)

Offline Sigquick

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Anyone try Nitesiters
« on: August 21, 2010, 05:51:46 PM »
Seems like I saw where someone on this forum put Nitesiters on the front ramp of an Rohrbaugh a while back. Search didn't pull anything up. Reviews seem to be fairly high on their web site. For those who don't know Nitesiters are a thick sticker material that retain light for around 10 hours or so depending on how much light they are exposed to. Reviews put them much brighter than trijicon type sites when fully charged. Any way I just ordered some.

Here's a little info on them:

Imagine something brighter than tritium and cheaper than dirt; Nitesiters should come to mind. They’re small dots of super photo-luminescent material on an industrial-strength adhesive backing that, when applied to existing sights can make a handgun more effective in lowlight situations. Can be charged with an LED or UV flashlight to glow all night long. Application kit includes everythingthe gun owner needs. For more info, contact: Nitesiters, PO Box 1981,Dept CH, Litchfield Park, AZ 85340; 602-327-0152; www.nitesiters.com
« Last Edit: August 21, 2010, 05:56:59 PM by SIGQUICK »

Offline kjtrains

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 8107
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2010, 06:41:01 PM »
Yep!  I started to order those and just never got around to doing it.  Finally decided I didn't need 'em; they do seem like good sites, though.
Let us have faith that right makes might, and in that faith, let us, to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it.  Abraham Lincoln

Offline tracker

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2010, 07:08:59 PM »
Let us know how you like them. A friend of mine ordered them and it took a long time to receive them. Hopefully, that won't be your experience.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2010, 07:23:30 PM by tracker »

Offline bama

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2010, 07:23:18 PM »
Sights on a pocket gun seem like a complete waste of time to me. When up close, which is what this gun is designed for, you don't need sights at all. Beyond that distance, it is hard to be "bullseye accurate" with a pocket gun, regardless of sights.
Dr John Meade
Director of Tactical Medicine
Suarez International

Offline tracker

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #4 on: August 21, 2010, 07:46:33 PM »
I agree with you, bama, but there are others who see it the other way.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2010, 07:47:12 PM by tracker »

Offline bama

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2010, 07:49:17 PM »
Quote
I agree with you, bama, but there are others who see it the other way.
That's why there are so many flavors of ice cream---everybody likes something different.   ;)
Dr John Meade
Director of Tactical Medicine
Suarez International

Offline Richard S

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 5772
  • Nemo me impune lacessit.
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2010, 07:49:17 PM »
Quote
Sights on a pocket gun seem like a complete waste of time to me. When up close, which is what this gun is designed for, you don't need sights at all. Beyond that distance, it is hard to be "bullseye accurate" with a pocket gun, regardless of sights.

Generally, I agree with that. If (God forbid) I ever need to fire my R9 in self defense, I expect it to be an up very close, very quick, and very personal event -- sights unused and extremely messy.  That is why I usually carry a 1911 or a P7 as primary. My early Farmingdale R9 has sights, but I do not consider them to be necessary for the pistol's intended use -- an OMG, TSIATHTF-and-I-need-to-shoot-that-SOB-before-he-shoots-me-or-mine event.
(1963-1967) "GO ARMY!"

Offline Sigquick

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2010, 11:47:57 PM »
OK... I agree with all the up close use comments, HOWEVER, there is a reason why the R9s is substantially more popular the R9. Its because we like sights. I've owned both the R9 and R9s models. I kept the one I was more accurate with. Odds of this gun being used in self defense are incredibly slim and sights that are usable can't hurt right? Even though it's not a range gun, for most enthusiasts it will never be shot anywhere else. Why not make the sights more viewable for range use? It would make range time with the gun more enjoyable for me. I shoot at round black falling plates at 15 yards with mine, my eyes don't recognize contrast as well as they used to, a white post would improve target acquisition. Plus the hope of increased night time visibility if ever needed. What's the harm?

I know many have painted their front posts, I was just curious if any had attempted to place the nitesiters on that small front post. Not sure how it will turn out, but for 20 bucks and enough material to apply many times it's worth a shot and cheaper than a box of Gold Dots ;D

« Last Edit: August 22, 2010, 12:02:27 AM by SIGQUICK »

Offline bama

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2010, 12:33:13 AM »
Quote
OK... I agree with all the up close use comments, HOWEVER, there is a reason why the R9s is substantially more popular the R9. Its because we like sights. I've owned both the R9 and R9s models. I kept the one I was more accurate with. Odds of this gun being used in self defense are incredibly slim and sights that are usable can't hurt right? Even though it's not a range gun, for most enthusiasts it will never be shot anywhere else. Why not make the sights more viewable for range use? It would make range time with the gun more enjoyable for me. I shoot at round black falling plates at 15 yards with mine, my eyes don't recognize contrast as well as they used to, a white post would improve target acquisition. Plus the hope of increased night time visibility if ever needed. What's the harm?
Not trying to rain on your parade. I fully agree, that at the range, good visibility of the sights is useful. I was just pointing out that all our tools are designed for certain things, and should best be used within the parameters of their design. I have made 80 yard head shots at the range with a service pistol, but would not try that with a pocket pistol, no matter how great the sights were.

And to be honest, I have painted more than one front sight on various guns.   ;D
Dr John Meade
Director of Tactical Medicine
Suarez International

Offline Richard S

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 5772
  • Nemo me impune lacessit.
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2010, 10:30:41 AM »
I painted the sights on a Colt Mod. Gold Cup Co2 Air Pistol cal. .177 (4.5 mm) which I use for "plinking" at the cabin.


(1963-1967) "GO ARMY!"

Offline sslater

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #10 on: August 22, 2010, 11:02:53 AM »
I tried Nitesiters a while back.  They're adequately bright, not noticeably brighter than new Trijicons.
Problem is keeping them stuck to the gun.  They disappeared after a few days of pocket carry on R9S front and rear sights.  And before application I degreased, degreased, degreased.
Had better luck with another pistol that has indented white dots.

Steve

Offline tracker

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #11 on: August 22, 2010, 11:36:20 AM »

I heard they are now including a separate tube of glue for extra adherence but I don't know that for certain.

Offline RickP

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2010, 11:14:21 AM »
I also tried Nitesiters and they would not stay on. Perhaps if dimples were machined into the sights the result would be different. There was no glue when I tried them so I don't know what effect that would have. I do have white and yellow fingernail polish on my sights. Yellow painted over white on the front, white on the back. Its been on for well over a year and still looks fresh. The painted sights do help when punching paper at the 7 yard line at the range.

Rick

Offline Sigquick

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2010, 10:48:18 PM »
Thanks for the feedback gentlemen. Looks like the best reviews are on 3 dot indented sights. Didn't see anything on their web sight about additional glue either. Hey, its still worth a shot. If they all fall off I'll try paint on front post.

Hey Rick, if you have a picture, I'd love to see it.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2010, 10:50:40 PM by SIGQUICK »

Offline RickP

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Re: Anyone try Nitesiters
« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2010, 11:27:49 PM »
Quote
Thanks for the feedback gentlemen. Looks like the best reviews are on 3 dot indented sights. Didn't see anything on their web sight about additional glue either. Hey, its still worth a shot. If they all fall off I'll try paint on front post.

Hey Rick, if you have a picture, I'd love to see it.



This picture was taken before I added the yellow to the front sight. Got the polish at Walgreens. Let us know how your's turns out.

Rick