Back to the OP....
The Rohrbaugh is significantly larger than the Seecamp. It's a pants pocket gun, not a vest pocket gun. That extra inch in length and height makes a difference. On the other hand, the Rohrbaugh IS a true pocket gun. It'll do the deep concealment job.
The Rohrbaugh has a LOT more recoil than the Seecamp. An LWS-32 is not terribly hard to do a double-tap with, while the R9 is a handful. Not extremely painful to shoot, just a lot of muzzle climb. It's a gun you practice with LAST, and for very few rounds of ammo - because a long range session is likely to build a flinch that will take months to eradicate.
On the other hand, the Seecamp has a fair trigger...that of the Rohrbaugh is outstanding. Comparable to a good S&W revolver.
I like them both.
I agree with most said , but respectfully disagree about the part about long range sessions building a flinch that will take month's to eradicate.
I'm no John Wayne. Years of shooting 44mag and high volume 45acp gave me serious nerve damage and carple tunnel- both hands, elbows, shoulders.
But I believe proper range training can PREVENT flinching with the R9. It's called CONCENTRATION.
Come on now, it's only a 9, and I am recoil sensitive now, and I have no problems whatsoever, even with double taps.
I am not a big man, average size - 5-10/190, medium sized hands.
Recoil is not a problem with the R9, in fact, I see no problems with the R9.
Cheers
Reinz