Author Topic: Ammo: Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???  (Read 8329 times)

Offline hoserack

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • #R2660
Ammo: Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« on: June 05, 2008, 12:26:25 AM »
I tend to like the Heavy and slow side myself.
I've been shooting the WWB 115g at the range and went to buy some heavier Prersonal Protection rounds.
I found the new GD 124g short barrel rounds bought them and after I got home I found they were +P.
Store wouldn't let me trade for something else either, damn Gander Mountain.
Will the 147g keyhole or should I stick with the smaller 124g in our R9?
I'm leaning towards the 147g.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2008, 01:32:25 PM by hoserack »

Offline Chinook

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
  • NRA Endowment Life Member
Re: Ammo Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2008, 03:39:06 AM »
Even though less effective in stopping power, I like the lighter bullets because there is less recoil... and I get better placement.
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."   Ben Franklin

Offline Brenden

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1747
  • Farmie!!!
Re: Ammo Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2008, 04:26:04 AM »
I personally do the 115s in the Pup...

Some owners have good luck with the heavier grains..

All you can do is see what your pup likes to digest!! ;)

Brenden
NRA Life Patron Member
GOA
Molon Labe

Offline theirishguard

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2707
  • In Memoriam: 1941 to 2013
    • irishguardfirearmsltd.com
Re: Ammo Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2008, 11:19:59 AM »
try the 124 gr GD.  Tom
Tom Watson, DVC , Quis Separabit ,  Who dares wins, Utrinque Paratus

Offline hoserack

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • #R2660
Re: Ammo Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2008, 12:08:39 PM »
Quote
try the 124 gr GD.  Tom

Thanks Tom,
In saw the balistics report on this site, but the guy only tested 115g & 124g. Why didn't he test 147g?
I also see the 124g didn't expand as well as the 115g.
I still like throwing weight at the target.
Will the 124g with our 2.9" barrel be the biggest round this gun will shoot with good expansion?
Do you think 147g will expand and get decent penetration?


Offline theirishguard

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2707
  • In Memoriam: 1941 to 2013
    • irishguardfirearmsltd.com
Re: Ammo: Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2008, 02:23:02 PM »
I think Richard shoots the 147 gr and likes it.  Tom
Tom Watson, DVC , Quis Separabit ,  Who dares wins, Utrinque Paratus

Offline dawkind

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 97
  • NRA Benefactor and don't EVER give up!
Re: Ammo: Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2008, 03:12:52 PM »
I don't think there's going to be al lot of expansion considering the barrel length so I, too, go for the heavy/deeper penetration and have had excellent accuracy and function with Winchester Ranger LEO 147gr. bonded hollow-point.

I practice with the good ol' WWB and shoot the 147gr Ranger when I cycle my ammo/magazines.
"I think for myself.....therefore I vote Conservative.....God Bless Ronald Reagan!"


Offline hoserack

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • #R2660
Re: Ammo: Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2008, 03:31:30 PM »
Check out this post, the guy did a great job.
Check out the bullet cal. comparisons.
http://loneranger2008.wordpress.com/tag/concealed-carry/
« Last Edit: June 05, 2008, 03:31:59 PM by hoserack »

Offline hoserack

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • #R2660
Re: Ammo: Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2008, 03:33:07 PM »
Has anyone ever shot the GD double tap or the Corbon 125g?

Offline RickP

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Re: Ammo: Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2008, 07:58:38 PM »
This link, provided originally I think by Richard, answeres the question for me as far as ammo in the R9 is concerned.

http://www.rohrbaughforum.com/YaBB.cgi?board=R9S;action=display;num=1155009072;start=0#0

Rick



Offline tracker

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 5398

Offline BytorJr

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
Re: Ammo: Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2008, 11:41:55 PM »
I had success with the HST 124g loads as well as 124g Gold Dots.  I shot mainly HST (about 40 rounds) and 30-40 rounds of Gold Dots  - all without cleaning the gun.  I'd recommend either as a starting place.


Offline hoserack

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • #R2660
Re: Ammo: Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2008, 12:12:43 AM »
No one seems to give you the same answer.
I'm still confused.  ???
I'm loaded with the 115g GD for now.
Nite all.

Offline BytorJr

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
Re: Ammo: Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #13 on: June 06, 2008, 01:57:50 AM »
Nothing wrong with 115 grain, but I chose midpoint; and it fits into my "9mm standard round" so that it can be used in any other 9mm I may eventually end up purchasing.  Personally, I believe 147g is too heavy for such a short barrel and with no +P to help even in the slightest.   Not that +P actually increases speed and energy that much in say the Federal HST LE rounds (124g).  

Big is slow is 45 ACP territory IMO, so that's my rationale.  I also shot HST and Gold Dot because I want to have a backup round should I need to go that direction.

I'd stay away from Double Tap ammo, especially in the R9 because it is extremely high pressure from what I understand.   Corbon is usually loaded hot, and it may or may not be +P.  DO NOT SHOOT +P in the R9!!


Offline Newt

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
  • NRA Benefactor Member & Cert. Pistol Instructor
Re: Ammo: Heavy & Slow Or Light & Fast???
« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2008, 08:48:15 AM »
124gr GDHP. I always had keyholeing with 147gr.
No matter how you struggle and strive, you will never get out of this world alive.