Author Topic: Trigger weight and impressions  (Read 9981 times)

Offline jarcher

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Re: Trigger weight and impressions
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2005, 03:01:14 PM »
Oh, on the snap caps, a good quality pistol generally does not need them for dry fire.  I like to use them to see who well the slide cycles and such.  Ingeneral, if I have them right handy I put them in.  If I don't then I won't worry about it, unless the maker says otherwise.

Offline Wayne

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: Trigger weight and impressions
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2005, 10:14:05 PM »
In my case, I don't believe I would have purchased the R9 if it was DA/SA.  Knowing the trigger is going to react identically with each pull is critical to me in the choice of a defensive carry weapon.  I like the fact that the DAO design doesn't require the external safety that would be demanded on a SA.  And in a pocket gun, an external safety also takes up real estate.  I also like the fact that the R9 DAO is just that, - not like a glock with the pre-cocking mechanism that requires the silde action to be engaged before being able to use the trigger.  No offense to anyone who owns a Glock, my first was a G32C, I just don't care for that action configuration in my pocket.

You might want to go the the rohrbaugh firearms web site, click on "downloads", and download the owners manual.  Page 2 contains an introduction by Karl on the design considerations and Page 3 contains a discussion on the DAO mechanism and consideration for lack of an external safety.

I'm not sure I completely agree with you on the snap cap issue.  I was always taught that it was better on the firing pin to hit a snap cap than to hit nothing.  I won't dry fire my Kimber without a snap cap.

To each his own, I guess. :)

Offline DDGator

  • Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2662
    • The Rohrbaugh Forum
Re: Trigger weight and impressions
« Reply #17 on: March 13, 2005, 06:40:24 PM »
The trigger pull is very much like a smooth and light double action pull on a revolver.  Far better than any box stock pull on a pocket auto that I have come across.

In fact, I haven't tried them side by side, but I am thinking that the R-9 has a better stock trigger pull than an NAA Guardian .380 I tried that had been back to the custom shop for trigger work.
Duane (DDGator)
Rohrbaugh Forum Administrator
E-mail: Admin-at-RohrbaughForum.com

Offline konrad

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Trigger weight and impressions
« Reply #18 on: March 15, 2005, 07:16:59 PM »
How is the trigger compares to a Kahr P9 trigger?
Kahr triggers  are nice!

Offline DDGator

  • Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2662
    • The Rohrbaugh Forum
Re: Trigger weight and impressions
« Reply #19 on: March 16, 2005, 12:33:26 AM »
I owned a PM-9 for a while and would say they are similar, but the R-9 is better (and lighter?).
Duane (DDGator)
Rohrbaugh Forum Administrator
E-mail: Admin-at-RohrbaughForum.com