Author Topic: A couple of questions concerning failures  (Read 71405 times)

Offline shelb

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #105 on: October 18, 2004, 06:26:01 PM »
I don't mean to come off the wrong way, I certainly don't mean to imply that Eric or Incursion is lying.  My point simply stated, is that it is unfair to speculate that either Incursion OR Eric or mother nature (for that matter :) ) hold responsibilty until the problem is discovered and remedied.  Even then it is counter productive.  I can not speak for Incursion's pistol, but mine was rebuilt as far as I was told.  In fact, I still have, on average 3 FTF's per 50-60 rounds.  This is the case with multiple shooters.  I am quite certain that Eric fired the heck out of mine testing it at the factory.....but it is a recurring problem for me....and it may just be me.  Unfortunately, I have had very little time to test my pistol since I have gotten it back (~120 rounds).....which is why I have been following Incursions ordeal with great interest.

Offline DDGator

  • Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2662
    • The Rohrbaugh Forum
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #106 on: October 18, 2004, 06:29:45 PM »
I didnt mean to infer that you or anyone was suggesting that anyone was lying -- its just my analysis.

As far as I can tell, when you post your experiences on an Internet forum you are inviting speculation.   :-/

I think the jury is still out and I hope that eventually we will find out the problem.

Duane (DDGator)
Rohrbaugh Forum Administrator
E-mail: Admin-at-RohrbaughForum.com

Offline RJ HEDLEY

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1026
  •         
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #107 on: October 18, 2004, 06:45:29 PM »
I agree with Rohrbaugh and Gator on the use of a high quailty grease.  I think any semi-auto should be lubed with a high quality grease.

The quantity, I may question.  I choose to lube often and make it well placed on ALL the contact points.

Also, I am not blaming Icursion, altho he does seem
to be a factor.

 
RJ=


 
 

Offline Incursion

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 70
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #108 on: October 18, 2004, 07:58:00 PM »
It seems like every time I get a chance to test the gun out, some new development occurs or I'm lacking some sort of information that's supposed to lend itself to making the gun work 100%.  When I got this new gun, I didn't know that it had to be lubed so much.  In fact, I thought the exact opposite.  I figured that a pocket gun would be designed to run nearly dry because the designers wouldn't want lint to accumulate and lock up the action.  

Plus, I didn't wipe off the superlube immediately.  I shot 6-7 mags with failures in every mag, and I'm not just talking about one or two.  It jammed on almost every round with the superlube.  

I'm concerned about the wear, but Eric doesn't seem to be and that should allay my worries.  It just irks me that the gun could have that much wear in such a short time.

I'm probably going to end up getting it sanded out or something once we get the problems solved.  

Offline justin2992

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #109 on: October 18, 2004, 10:24:20 PM »
Quote
Incursion wrote:  I noticed that the barrel is shearing at the lockup point and the slide's metal is very rough as well where it locks up with the barrel.
I just field stripped my new R9s for the first time after a range session.  Its barrel and slide look exactly the same at the lock up as yours does.  I shot it as it came from the factory.  I didn't even field strip it before shooting it.  I shot 110 rounds of WWB with one failure to feed during rapid fire after the 50 round mark.  I also shot 50 rounds of Gold Dot 115 grain after the 110 rounds of WWB with 2 failures to feed during rapid fire.  The gun was not cleaned or field stripped at the range.  All in all the experience was very positive and I now carry my R9s instead of my kel-spec P32.
The 1938 Nazi Weapons Law is alive and well in the United States, and is called, "The Gun Control act of 1968", and is enforced by the modern day gestapo, known as the BATF.

Offline Incursion

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 70
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #110 on: October 19, 2004, 12:17:14 AM »
Yeah, I take back the statement about it being very rough.  It's only a little bit rough.  Maybe I'm just being paranoid.

Offline TCat

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #111 on: October 19, 2004, 02:00:25 PM »
Quote
The thing that puzzles me is, the worst of the problems are here with this Gun, [or is it guns now?] ,  and one user.  

Is this just bad luck ?  ???
It may be bad luck, but there are reports elsewhere of the R9 not being reliable as I pointed out a few weeks ago.  Not just Incursion and not just Gun Tests.  Part of the issue may be that, as DDGator pointed out, this is an enthusiast forum and some members may be a bit harsh on alternate perspectives and experiences, which may reduce additional postings on those issues.  That's always a tough balancing act for enthusiast fora.

Offline DDGator

  • Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2662
    • The Rohrbaugh Forum
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #112 on: October 19, 2004, 02:16:10 PM »
No doubt this board may not always be a representative sample, however, I can tell you that to my knowledge, all of the owners of "problem" guns (two or three?) that have sought assistance from the factory have been discussed on this forum.  If there are a lot of other people unhappy with their R-9s, they are not picking up the phone and calling Rohrbaugh.

I would respectfully suggest that the number of R-9s experiecing problems is very low.  As with anything on the Internet, the focus is usually on the negative (which is more interesting), so it appears to be inflated.

How many people who own and R-9 and post here have not bothered to post a range report that everything is working properly?  Dull, boring.  There is no flood of guns back to Rohrbaugh, and no inherent problems with this gun.

Are there isolated problems?  Yes.  It remains to be seen what the true source will be -- if we ever know -- but lots of people here probably have their own opinions.


Duane (DDGator)
Rohrbaugh Forum Administrator
E-mail: Admin-at-RohrbaughForum.com

Offline TW

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 537
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #113 on: October 19, 2004, 02:53:56 PM »
Quote
It may be bad luck, but there are reports elsewhere of the R9 not being reliable as I pointed out a few weeks ago.  Not just Incursion and not just Gun Tests.  Part of the issue may be that, as DDGator pointed out, this is an enthusiast forum and some members may be a bit harsh on alternate perspectives and experiences, which may reduce additional postings on those issues.  That's always a tough balancing act for enthusiast fora.

>>TCat...  You bring up a good point about this being an enthusiast forum, but I for one would like to think I am open to hearing what you call "alternate perspectives" if it means learning more about the R9 and/or how to manage this gun to it's full potential.  If this means criticisms about the gun - fine...as long as they are constructive criticisms as opposed to hearsay put downs.  When reviewing such criticisms I believe it is important to first establish if the user understands the purpose of the gun, how and why it is built to such close tolerences, and how to apply the special care required to maintain the gun to peak preformance.  Once these parameters are established - only then, IMO, can you begin to examine and understand the problem...whether it be with the gun or the shooter.  

You mention "reports elsewhere" describing the R9 as an unreliable gun.  Can you provide references to these reports, and based on the criteria mentioned above...can you offer an unbiased opinion about the problems...?...TW<<


Offline Incursion

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 70
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #114 on: October 24, 2004, 02:15:37 AM »
Ok, so I met up with Jax today at my friend's range.  I had a failure to extract on the first magazine.  The extractor looked like it was taking off a small chunk of the casing.    I kept getting failure to extracts.  Then Jax shot it and the magazine came out when he fired it.  Then the magazine started coming out on me almost every round.  Finally, the guide rod broke where it connects to that disc-like piece.  We shot mine around 100 rounds.  I broke it down and cleaned it after about 64 rounds.  I switched the recoil spring after the 2nd or 3rd magazine.  

I shot 10 magazines through his gun with only one failure to eject and I'm pretty sure it was due to a flinch.  His gun only malfunctioned twice the whole day, and I'm pretty sure we shot more than 100 rounds through it.

Ok, here's the exact breakdown:

Round 03 Failure to Extract
Round 07 Failure to Extract
Round 15 Failure to Extract
Round 30 Failure to Eject
Round 51 Failure to Extract
Round 82 Faliure to Extract

I didn't log the rounds where the magazine came out because I thought it was user error at first.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2004, 11:50:44 AM by Incursion »

Offline DDGator

  • Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2662
    • The Rohrbaugh Forum
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #115 on: October 24, 2004, 12:15:28 PM »

The guide rod broke?  At what point in the process?

That mag catch is so simple and you can see what it does -- can you elaborate on why it would not keep the mag in place.  What there something wrong with the spring tension?

What ammo were you shooting -- you don't say.

What are you calling the difference between a failure to extract and a failure to eject?  Is failure to eject a stovepipe?

JAX -- what is your take on all this?

Duane (DDGator)
Rohrbaugh Forum Administrator
E-mail: Admin-at-RohrbaughForum.com

Offline Incursion

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 70
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #116 on: October 24, 2004, 02:06:45 PM »
50 rounds of Blazer, and the rest were Speer Gold Dot 115 gr.

The guide rod broke at the end of the session and prevented us from shooting more.  I have no idea why the magazine was coming out.  Perhaps, the spring loosened up?

Failure to Eject is a stovepipe.

Offline Jax

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #117 on: October 24, 2004, 04:05:45 PM »
I think all of us there could agree that the problem is a combination of gun-issues, ammo-issues and shooter-issues - in *that* order.  Failure to maintain per Rohrbaugh recommendations is *not* the problem.  Incursion field stripped, cleaned and lubed his gun very carefully and well within the suggested shots-fired range.

Shooter-issues:

Incursion had continuous problems with his gun.  He rarely got through a single mag without a problem of some sort.

However, he shot my R-9S extensively and only had one failure.  On that failure, he turned around as soon as it happened and said something to the effect of "I think I pulled that one or limp-wristed it".  To his credit, he immediately took responsibility when he thought that he might have been the cause of the problem.

I had zero problems with my gun, shooting either FMJ or JHP.  When I shot Incursion's R-9, I experienced one FTX.  Also, the mag released and dropped into my palm a couple of times.  This has *never* happened on my pistol.

I was surprised at the amount and variety of failures that we experienced with Incursion's R-9.  Failures which we, including Incursion, did not experience with mine.  This is *not* primarily a shooter-issue.

Ammo-issues:

Incursion's R-9 shot more reliably with Blazer FMJ than it did with Gold Dot JHP.

The ejection of Gold Dots was problematic on basically every shot.  What Incursion hasn't mentioned is that when his pistol *did* eject the GDs, it tossed the cases straight back into his face.  He had multiple strikes to his safety glasses and even had a couple of minor cuts on his forehead (with blood!) by the time we were done.  Blazer cases were ejected better, but we still saw some FTX issues.

His GDs shot reliably in my R-9, with multiple shooters, including Incursion.  We didn't run any Blazer through mine.  (I just don't like the stuff.)

Gun-isues:

1)  Lots of FTX.  It looked like the extractor claw was "bouncing" over the case rim, chewing it up in the process.  I don't know why, but Incursions R-9 is not able to reliably extract the case from the chamber.

2)  Some FTE.  Not the classic stovepipe.  As far as I can recall, every FTE looked the same.  The cases were pointing forward, in-line with the barrel, caught between the rear edge of the slide ejection port and the rear edge of the chamber.  The case rim was chewed up the same.  It looked like the FTEs were FTXs that got a little further - but didn't beat the slide.

3)  Mag releasing.  Weird.  At first, we blamed it on Incursions shooting grip (thought he might be tea-cup gripping - nope).  Then we blamed it on his gloves.  Pulled them off and it still kept happening.

4)  Guide rod.  We couldn't beleive what we were seeing.  After taking my gun apart, it was clear that the disk end of the guide rod, which butts up to the lug on the bottom of the barrel, is both screwed and welded.  The welding broke and the smaller rod came out the front.  At this point, we were done with his R-9.

After all of this, I was a little nervous about letting him shoot my gun extensively...  Wouldn't you be?  :-)  We decided to do it anyway.  He ran 10 mags through it with a variety of ammo with only the one problem, which he thinks is likely his fault.

More later.  SWMBO is getting antsy to get errands done.

Buh-bye!

Jax

 


Offline RJ HEDLEY

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1026
  •         
Re: A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #118 on: October 24, 2004, 04:19:01 PM »
About Incursions pistol:

Well,.........with this new post from Jax, I must withdraw a few of my past comments, or veiled implications, and will make no more comments on this matter... :-X :-[ :-/  

RJ=


 
 

Offline TW

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 537
A couple of questions concerning failures
« Reply #119 on: October 24, 2004, 04:40:34 PM »
>>WOW.  Gotta say I am stunned.  And like RJ but with a bit more to grovel about...I take back all the unwarrented suspicions I had that Incursion might have been the primary cause of the gun failures (does being jinxed count?)...so I publically apologize to you, Incursion, if I put you on the spot and made you feel uncomfortable here about solving this problem(s).  My bad...very, very bad.  The thing is...if I were to hear a similar litnay of issues spoken about another gun with problems...probably my first thoughts would again be to check for shooter error.  However, if a next time does take place I will try to express my concerns in a less...pointed way?   **TW scratches his head**...

The good news is...between Incursion and Jax there is now a rather detailed listing of the problems with Incursion's gun - well done guys...!!...at least I can take some credit for suggesting you get with another R9 shooter to try and figure this all out...does that count as trying to be constructive - lol...???  So...I guess it is back to Rohrbaugh.  Wow...I'm glad I'm not Eric just now...I wonder if the life time warranty covers  a "jinx"...?...  Good luck, Incursion...please do keep us posted. Oh...and Jax - great job of helping Incursion to figure out the problem(s) with his R9...!...and good job of articulating your findings so that even a thick headed being like myself can sort of understand it...!...TW<<