Well, I'm going to restrain myself here.
I personally do not like the fact the magazine safety is there; but, I live with it. That in and of itself doesn't make it $##@ as you say. You can verify the chamber by looking into the gun...you can see the round. I usually have my unloaded magazine and put it in and back off about 1/4". Then, I eject any live round I have. Very rarely do I have this problem, because I clean mine every time I shoot; even though recently that hasn't been an issue. Not once on my carry ammo have I had a problem with a "dry" gun (I use EEZOX which hangs around for a while) not cycling the rounds.
Are they $@#$ as you say. Nope. Mine had some problems, but Mr. Seecamp has come through each and every time. I have had no problem since Larry tweeked mine on ANY self defense load (I don't like the setback corbon has). Let me clarify my loads: Hornady, Gold Dot, Hydrashock. I've only had RECENT trouble with the Winchester flat nose FMJ's I use for practice - my suspicion of the mag springs...I didn't have this problem a few hundred rounds ago.
I've also shot my Seecamp quite a lot. It sees 30-50 rounds per outing on average.
Are they ammo finicky? Some can be, but so are most small guns, including the R9. The 32ACP presents the rimlock problem too; which the Seecamp's solved long before Kel-Tec put their spacer in. I've never heard of a rimlock case in the LWS32.
If you're getting your info from The High Road or Firing Line, there is one guy on there who just won't give up on how bad Seecamp is - like a personal vendetta against Mr. Seecamp...just weigh that for what it's worth. Also, some people claimed they paid 800 bucks for the gun (LWS 32)..well, that's their problem. It NEVER listed for more than current list.