I had a Taurus Total Titanium 2.5" .41 magnum 415Ti (total weight just under 21 ounces). That was a feisty little gun, but not nearly as bad as I had expected. The porting (which I don't like in general) and Taurus' superb "ribber" stocks made shooting it somewhat better than getting a root canal. Nevertheless, I would have a crowd gather behind me every time I shot it, and only rarely could I convince anyone else to take a try with it.
I got the gun because it was $299, brand new! I've always loved the .41 magnum (I reload for it routinely), and I thought, "Gee, that would be a dandy hiking gun. Plus, I could actually use it for concealed carry down in the city."
Well, I got rid of it when I realized that my .41 mag follow-up shot would come about a week after the initial shot (gross exaggeration, but you know what I mean) - and I know that criminals rarely work alone on muggings - so I thought that probably wasn't as optimal a solution as a similarly sized 9mm like my G26.
The quality of the 415Ti was overall pretty good. I was a little disturbed by the roughness of the cylinder star (which is a not untypical Taurus issue), but it worked fine.
In any event, I sold it (after putting 150-200 rounds through it) for $300, so it was a good experience for me.
Now, I've fired the all-steel Taurus .44 special. I have to say it was a very pleasant gun to shoot. I would imagine that the Ti version would shoot just fine, because there's such a profound difference in power between the .44 special and the .41 mag. Also, the Total Ti gun is certainly heavier than Charter Arms Bulldog .44 spl (which, originally at least, had an aluminum frame), and that was totally shootable (until you got into the warm-ish handloads). It's probably still going to be somewhat slow for follow-up shots, though.