I have two Gen. 2 Glocks a 19 and a 27. Recently
a good friend and shooting buddy of mine asked
when I was getting a new Gen. 4 Glock. I said
never. He was shocked because he knows how
much I enjoy shooting my Glocks at the Range.
He asked why not and I responded by asking him
when he was buying a "NEW" Colt 1911 A1.
The problem is you can't buy a "NEW" Colt 1911
pistol. You can buy a 100 year old 1911 made
recently, as far as I'm concerned thats NOT new
but outdated. The Glock suffers from the
same problem. When Gaston or rather Glock INC.
bothers to bring their gun into the modern
world and makes it go BANG on every
pull of the Trigger, then and only then will
I consider buying a NEW Glock. A Gen. 4 Glock
is nothing more than a Gen. 1 with different
grips. Its a forty year old design. I'd prefer to
buy a Boberg or a Rohrbaugh or something
thats actually legitimately modern.
I enjoy owning and shooting Glocks and Colts
and my Luger made in 1917, but as long as
Glock allows their guns to stagnate, I won't be
buying a Gen. 4 and I won't be carrying my Gen. 2's
anywhere except to the Range. Their will be
no Gen. 4 Glock in my future.
What kind of gun is in YOUR future? Are YOU
attracted to a stagnant gun design? Do you
lie to yourself and believe that a (insert OLD
gun design here) is as good as a truly modern
gun? Do you carry an OLD gun design when
it would make more sense and be safer to
carry a modern one?
I would never carry a Club or a Sword or a Musket
or a 1911 Colt or a 1917 German Luger or even
a Gen. 4 Glock........they are simply not as safe
as a truly modern gun design. I wonder how
many are honest with themselves and agree
with me?