Author Topic: Re: Gun-tests.com test R9 vs PM9  (Read 3758 times)

Offline logical

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Gun-tests.com test R9 vs PM9
« on: May 29, 2005, 11:01:58 AM »
Search a little here and you'll find everything to be known about this very old news.  Never trust a man in flannel and a bad haircut.
« Last Edit: May 29, 2005, 11:03:15 AM by logical »

Offline RJ HEDLEY

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1026
  •         
Re: Gun-tests.com test R9 vs PM9
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2005, 11:18:31 AM »
Gun Test Magazine has never impressed me, Its data base is, well,  how do I say this??  

Just an un-educated opinion of the Editor. ::)
RJ=


 
 

Offline Newt

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
  • NRA Benefactor Member & Cert. Pistol Instructor
Re: Gun-tests.com test R9 vs PM9
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2005, 12:06:20 PM »
The ammo they claimed tumbled is not the manufactures reccomended ammo ie: 124gr or 115gr GDHP. With this ammo I have never had any problems. If you have a toaster for sliced bread don't try to put hamburger rolls in it! ::) ;D
No matter how you struggle and strive, you will never get out of this world alive.

Offline Newt

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
  • NRA Benefactor Member & Cert. Pistol Instructor
Re: Gun-tests.com test R9 vs PM9
« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2005, 03:24:08 PM »
Could this be specific to some barrels and not others?
No matter how you struggle and strive, you will never get out of this world alive.