Bubbaman:
No one is trashing you for investigating. I believe you posted your first inquiries on the R9 back on November 25, 2005, in which you stated:
[size=10]I'm amazed at the number of posts, discussions, etc. concerning failures to feed, and the many other issues[/size].
You then asked about the R9's recoil compared to a pocket pistol chambered for .380 ACP, and that same day I posted the following response:
[size=10]Bubbaman:
Welcome to the Forum.
I own both the Guardian .380 and the R9. Bearing in mind that felt recoil is highly subjective, I find my G380's recoil, even with +P ammunition, to be a little less than that of my R9. I would describe the R9's recoil as "stout" but entirely manageable.
As to the cost of the R9, the best simply costs more -- more to manufacture and more to purchase. I have one of the first R9s sold to the public and am pleased to report that it has shown no vices. [/size]
That R9 I mentioned back on November 25, 2005, is in my pocket today. After three years and four months of service, it still has shown no vices.
I've been a regular follower of this Forum from its earliest days and can count on the fingers of one hand the number of R9s which have reportedly suffered from irreparable "defects." When one considers that the number of R9s produced is now approaching the 3,000 mark and that so-called "problem guns" will always generate more chatter on the boards and forums than those which are "well behaved," I personally have no concerns whatsoever about the R9's reliability. I trust my life and the life of my beloved little wife with mine. And in the odd event that some problem ever develops with my R9, I know that the factory will make it right.
Therefore, my advice would be as follows: If you want the smallest, lightest, most concealable, full-power 9mm pistol yet made -- a design now well-proven by more than three years of service -- get an R9, wrap it in some great leather, feed it a diet of gold (Dots or Sabers), and enjoy!
Good luck to you.